alust2013
May 3, 11:40 AM
I'd just get the 24GB. Even that should be way more than you need, unless you are running several VMs as well as photoshop, etc. But you certainly wouldn't notice any adverse effects from 32GB if that's what you wanted to know.
benhollberg
Mar 13, 01:27 AM
Yeah. You had any luck? How much are you making per iPad? Maybe pm me if you don't
Mind
For some reason it is not giving me the option to send you a private message, but I have sold all the iPads I have bought except for the one I kept for myself. Also I have people that are still calling me and shouldn't have any trouble selling a lot more. On eBay they are going for a lot internationally, but I don't like all the hassle of eBay even for double the price.
Mind
For some reason it is not giving me the option to send you a private message, but I have sold all the iPads I have bought except for the one I kept for myself. Also I have people that are still calling me and shouldn't have any trouble selling a lot more. On eBay they are going for a lot internationally, but I don't like all the hassle of eBay even for double the price.
fangiotophia
Jan 16, 01:12 PM
Actually, I have been looking for a new monitor and was really hoping that the ACDs would be updated. At the very least, their price is almost twice that of a similar display from practically everyone else. Granted, they have a nicer design, but a 6ms refresh time is pretty slow these days.
I just bought a Mac Pro and really would love the remote/iSight to go with it. Since they have discontinued the actual iSight, I would have to buy a new laptop just to get one! That's just unreasonable.
I just bought a Mac Pro and really would love the remote/iSight to go with it. Since they have discontinued the actual iSight, I would have to buy a new laptop just to get one! That's just unreasonable.
ChazUK
Apr 20, 03:52 PM
Incredible numbers. Well deserved.
AT&T sold 3.6, apple says 18.65. Did verizon sell the rest of the ~15 million? :eek:
Rest of the world? :D
AT&T sold 3.6, apple says 18.65. Did verizon sell the rest of the ~15 million? :eek:
Rest of the world? :D
ryannel2003
Sep 15, 11:15 AM
I was in 6th Grade at the time, and one of the teachers motioned my teacher over to them. She came back with a grim face and told everyone that a plane had just hit the World Trade Center. At the time, I was uncertain about what the World Trade Center was, or what was happening. She continued on with the lesson, while all the other classes were watching TV (that bitch). Anyway, my mom checked me out of school a couple of hours later and I went home to turn on the the television. I couldn't believe what was happening. At first I didn't understand it, but years later I knew exactly what had happened.
zacman
Apr 18, 03:20 PM
Let's hope the dualcore A5 will fix the choppy iOS animations when you start third party apps.
karohan
Apr 25, 11:49 PM
I think that's pretty normal. Apps just start to use more RAM the longer you keep them up, whether or not people admit it.
For example, after Safari is open for a couple weeks, it uses much more RAM. Of course a large part of that is me having 52 tabs open, but I notice that while Safari uses 1.66 GB now, restarting Safari completely (and restoring all of my tabs via the extension Glims), uses 1.01 GB of RAM. Clearly, having Safari open causes an accumulation of RAM. I don't know if this is because browsing various sites causes those sites to be stored in RAM at all (I always thought they were just stored in the cache however).
I've noticed this with other programs too, like iTunes and iChat. Opening iChat can use maybe 60MB and it can rise to 100MB. iTunes can rise from 60-70MB to around 100-130MB.
I don't notice a slowdown really, but that is because I have 8GB of RAM. Nevertheless, if the RAM usage is important to you, you can use some apps over others. I found Adium uses consistently less RAM than iChat. You can quit out of iTunes when you aren't playing music. I'm not sure about Chrome, but maybe closing tabs will reduce the RAM occupied by that tab since Chrome sandboxes each tab. Either way, I don't know if I blame Snow Leopard. Did this happen in Leopard at all? I just figure it's because of lazy application developers who use the wealth of RAM available on computers today to be lazy with optimizing performance and resource intensiveness.
For example, after Safari is open for a couple weeks, it uses much more RAM. Of course a large part of that is me having 52 tabs open, but I notice that while Safari uses 1.66 GB now, restarting Safari completely (and restoring all of my tabs via the extension Glims), uses 1.01 GB of RAM. Clearly, having Safari open causes an accumulation of RAM. I don't know if this is because browsing various sites causes those sites to be stored in RAM at all (I always thought they were just stored in the cache however).
I've noticed this with other programs too, like iTunes and iChat. Opening iChat can use maybe 60MB and it can rise to 100MB. iTunes can rise from 60-70MB to around 100-130MB.
I don't notice a slowdown really, but that is because I have 8GB of RAM. Nevertheless, if the RAM usage is important to you, you can use some apps over others. I found Adium uses consistently less RAM than iChat. You can quit out of iTunes when you aren't playing music. I'm not sure about Chrome, but maybe closing tabs will reduce the RAM occupied by that tab since Chrome sandboxes each tab. Either way, I don't know if I blame Snow Leopard. Did this happen in Leopard at all? I just figure it's because of lazy application developers who use the wealth of RAM available on computers today to be lazy with optimizing performance and resource intensiveness.
euromickey
Oct 5, 05:51 PM
Since many of my customers send incomplete orders due to a lack af JS abilities in Safari I have added an alert popup which can be tested at http://www.watchband.biz/pub/orderform.htm. I cannot test it since I don't have access to a MAC with Safari on it. So may I ask you folks to have a look?
Thanks.
Thanks.
skiltrip
Sep 2, 01:28 PM
The Pixelskin HD from Speck looked like a good pick for the iPhone 4, and I hope to see one for the new Touch.
BenRoethig
Oct 12, 02:36 PM
Why on Earth would you expect Apple to ship iWork with it's machines for free? iWork is not MS Works - it's already far superior, and it's still a baby. In one or two more revisions, iWork will be a better overall suite of Apps than Office (which frankly, isn't saying much). It's unreasonable to expect Apple to give that away for free.
I don't know maybe because prior to January every consumer machine shipped since about 1990 has come with a consumer productivity suite and maybe I don't apple to lose sales because of sure stupidity. And yes iWork is like MS works. It is not an office suite, it was never meant to be, and it never will be one. It is the replacement for Appleworks. Hence the name iWork instead of Work Pro. Apple is smart enough to realize that it can't beat Microsoft in the office environment.
I don't know maybe because prior to January every consumer machine shipped since about 1990 has come with a consumer productivity suite and maybe I don't apple to lose sales because of sure stupidity. And yes iWork is like MS works. It is not an office suite, it was never meant to be, and it never will be one. It is the replacement for Appleworks. Hence the name iWork instead of Work Pro. Apple is smart enough to realize that it can't beat Microsoft in the office environment.
ezekielrage_99
Mar 15, 12:04 AM
The was always like the drunk 16 year old girl who arrives at a party in 4am and wonders why everyone is going home.
Though there wasn't anything that tragic about the Zune it just arrived on the Marketplace by far too late to gain any momentum or traction. The other main issue was that it was supposed to be the "first" real competition for the iPod yet it couldn't do anything better than an iPod, the *only* real thing it had upon release over the iPod was an FM tuner (BFD)...
Again I am really surprised they didn't spin off the XBOX360 success with a more integrated or game based Zune, it would have been a winner IMHO.
Though there wasn't anything that tragic about the Zune it just arrived on the Marketplace by far too late to gain any momentum or traction. The other main issue was that it was supposed to be the "first" real competition for the iPod yet it couldn't do anything better than an iPod, the *only* real thing it had upon release over the iPod was an FM tuner (BFD)...
Again I am really surprised they didn't spin off the XBOX360 success with a more integrated or game based Zune, it would have been a winner IMHO.
HooHar
Jan 22, 02:16 PM
If I were a betting man, I'd bet on new displays (or at least a price drop) at NAB. ;)
Have Apple ever announced new hardware at NAB before ?
Have Apple ever announced new hardware at NAB before ?
belvdr
Mar 18, 06:23 AM
I have a very convoluted home network. The route from Internet to my current primary system is:
Cable Modem --100MbitEthernet--> AirPort Extreme-n --WiFi-n--> AirPort Extreme-n --GigabitEthernet--> MacBook
When I do a speed test over Ethernet, I get 20-25 Mbps. (This is traveling over 802.11n WiFi to cross the house from one AirPort base to a second.) When I do the same speed test over 802.11g WiFi, connecting to the primary base station, 3 feet away from it, I get 10 Mbps.
That configuration could also be your issue. Each Wi-Fi link is only half duplex, so any packet you send can cause the receiving packets to slow (i.e. collisions). Running from one AP is likely not going to have the same impact.
Cable Modem --100MbitEthernet--> AirPort Extreme-n --WiFi-n--> AirPort Extreme-n --GigabitEthernet--> MacBook
When I do a speed test over Ethernet, I get 20-25 Mbps. (This is traveling over 802.11n WiFi to cross the house from one AirPort base to a second.) When I do the same speed test over 802.11g WiFi, connecting to the primary base station, 3 feet away from it, I get 10 Mbps.
That configuration could also be your issue. Each Wi-Fi link is only half duplex, so any packet you send can cause the receiving packets to slow (i.e. collisions). Running from one AP is likely not going to have the same impact.
gman901
Apr 23, 03:10 PM
Thanks! Yes, I have lowered them and get about 15 fps on both games. I guess I can live with that considering the resolution is a step above playing these games through something like Onlive which is kind of janky on wifi and muddy graphics.
chrono1081
May 5, 10:48 AM
Alright lets start with simple here, reinstall XCode from a downloaded image from Apple.
I'll have to give that a try. I thought it was an error in the code somewhere and there is almost nothing relevant online about the error (or if I find something people say they fixed it but don't say how :( )
For now I have a workaround of just creating new projects and copying the authors code in and running it that way for now.
I'll have to give that a try. I thought it was an error in the code somewhere and there is almost nothing relevant online about the error (or if I find something people say they fixed it but don't say how :( )
For now I have a workaround of just creating new projects and copying the authors code in and running it that way for now.
darrylthebest
Mar 21, 10:38 PM
Found it in Jan Desktops
http://forums.macrumors.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=266787&d=1294575713
http://forums.macrumors.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=266787&d=1294575713
celo48
Apr 4, 04:14 PM
Don't have one but I think it is the best laptop ever made. The 11.6" that is.
uNext
Nov 8, 08:42 AM
i love macs i love the simplicity but theres nothing out there
that will topple microsoft office period.
that will topple microsoft office period.
nwroberts
Apr 17, 11:10 AM
It's Western Digital. Enough said. Take it back and get Seagate of any kind.
And then the IT guy inside of me wants to know if you tried restarting your computer yet?
And then the IT guy inside of me wants to know if you tried restarting your computer yet?
spuncan
Apr 12, 05:03 PM
other then inside macgame's forum (doesnt have much and rarely visited)
there are many well regulated Forums that dont belong to clans along w/ the fact that common folk arent that welcome. So please make a Games forum in ur next forum update. As for the new forums both cool the switch over one sounds a little better just beacuse ebay seems to be very prominent and the collectables forum seems to be good enought for announcements of bids.
there are many well regulated Forums that dont belong to clans along w/ the fact that common folk arent that welcome. So please make a Games forum in ur next forum update. As for the new forums both cool the switch over one sounds a little better just beacuse ebay seems to be very prominent and the collectables forum seems to be good enought for announcements of bids.
SWD
May 3, 07:57 AM
I've posted this in several other forums with few replies. Hopefully this great people of this forum can help me out. Just today I discovered that in a few 3rd party apps (namely Audacity) the media browser works perfectly.
The media browser, which is a system-wide open dialogue feature in OSX has been failing to show the iTunes library in my main (but not admin) account. It shows photos and movies just fine, but nothing from iTunes. Garageband files yes, but iTunes library nope. For example if I wanted to add music to a slideshow I can pull down to iTunes but nothing is there. Same if I wanted to attach an .mp3 to an email, or add music to a movie. Same thing happens in Chrome, Pages, Numbers, Keynote, etc. Interesting, it is unique to this user account. I've tried it in another user account that has an iTunes library and it worked just fine. Any idea on how to fix this? I'm guessing there's a preference somewhere I could delete that could rebuild it. I don't want to trash any iTunes library files as I have spent years building playlists, metadata, stats, etc. Thanks for your help.
The media browser, which is a system-wide open dialogue feature in OSX has been failing to show the iTunes library in my main (but not admin) account. It shows photos and movies just fine, but nothing from iTunes. Garageband files yes, but iTunes library nope. For example if I wanted to add music to a slideshow I can pull down to iTunes but nothing is there. Same if I wanted to attach an .mp3 to an email, or add music to a movie. Same thing happens in Chrome, Pages, Numbers, Keynote, etc. Interesting, it is unique to this user account. I've tried it in another user account that has an iTunes library and it worked just fine. Any idea on how to fix this? I'm guessing there's a preference somewhere I could delete that could rebuild it. I don't want to trash any iTunes library files as I have spent years building playlists, metadata, stats, etc. Thanks for your help.
Fugabutacus
May 5, 07:18 PM
This had probably being asked before, but I didn't wanna resurrect an ancient thread, so here we are.
How are the entry level 21" iMacs at video editing? I'd be editing 720p video. I'm sure they'd be fine, but I'm wondering if anyone has any experience to share to reassure me?
I'm probably going to get one.
With student discounts I can get the 21" with Final Cut Studio and Photoshop for about �1,300. Sounds worth it to me!
How are the entry level 21" iMacs at video editing? I'd be editing 720p video. I'm sure they'd be fine, but I'm wondering if anyone has any experience to share to reassure me?
I'm probably going to get one.
With student discounts I can get the 21" with Final Cut Studio and Photoshop for about �1,300. Sounds worth it to me!
ariel
Oct 4, 10:12 AM
Yep, I'm with you on that. It already bugs me that my Prius has a black box for accidents and a GPS built in (for the nav system.) Why do we *trust* this government to not ask companies to turn that information over (just like they asked for our phone records) and for these corporations getting billions in tax incentives to eagerly comply? Now if you carry a GPS, government will be able to know where you are at any moment. I'm not buying it unless Apple includes a pledge with the product that they will fight to protect my legal rights if any government agency asks for these records without probable cause.
Um hello...
GPS units do NOT broadcast out to the world your location. They recieve only.
Now, your cell phone broadcasts out your location to the world, but you don't seem too worried about that now do ya?
Now, if indeed this is an iPhone, then you're already broadcasting your location so who cares... but GPS units all by themselves only receive signals from satelites.
Um hello...
GPS units do NOT broadcast out to the world your location. They recieve only.
Now, your cell phone broadcasts out your location to the world, but you don't seem too worried about that now do ya?
Now, if indeed this is an iPhone, then you're already broadcasting your location so who cares... but GPS units all by themselves only receive signals from satelites.
boshii
Mar 25, 12:19 AM
I bet this comes April 1.
No comments:
Post a Comment